Regarding indirect lighting, which of the following statements is true as compared to direct lighting?

Prepare for the ABSA 5th Class test with in-depth flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Get hints and explanations for each question. Equip yourself for success now!

Indirect lighting is designed to illuminate a space by bouncing light off walls and ceilings, creating a softer and more diffuse light effect compared to direct lighting, which shines directly onto surfaces.

The characteristics of indirect lighting generally enhance the ambiance of a space and can reduce harsh shadows. However, concerning energy efficiency, indirect lighting can sometimes be less efficient than direct lighting, primarily because it may require more lumens to achieve the same level of brightness in a room. This is due to the nature of how light is distributed and how surfaces absorb and reflect it.

In addition, indirect lighting fixtures often have more complex designs that may require higher wattage or more fixtures overall to achieve desired illumination levels. This means that while indirect lighting contributes to comfort and aesthetics, it might not be as effective in terms of energy use compared to direct lighting, which often provides a more concentrated and efficient light output for specific tasks or areas.

Thus, the assertion that indirect lighting is less energy efficient relative to direct lighting aligns with the principles of lighting design, emphasizing the distribution and effects of light within a space.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy